summarize_logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention if the operation is read-only, safe, or has any side effects. The description focuses on output content but lacks transparency on behavior beyond what is stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, front-loaded, and concise. It wastes no words but could benefit from a bit more detail without becoming verbose. However, it is efficient for its purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, and the description does not explain the return structure or format of the statistical overview. Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description should provide more context about what the agent will receive, such as whether it's a JSON object or a list.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the 'date' parameter already described well. The description repeats 'on a specific date' but adds no significant additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a statistical audit overview of log files for a specific date, listing specific categories. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools (e.g., search_logs, get_latest_error) by focusing on a summary rather than individual logs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies using this tool when a statistical summary for a date is needed, but it does not explicitly specify when to use alternatives or provide 'when not' guidance. The context of siblings suggests this is for overview, but explicit guidance is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.