search_job_logs_by_name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only says 'filters' with no disclosure of behavioral traits such as read-only, pagination, or whether it returns latest logs. Full burden on description, which is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, front-loaded with verb, no wasted words. Could be slightly more structured but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With high schema coverage, no output schema, and a simple purpose, the description lacks details on return format, limit behavior, or default value. Leaves gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. Description adds an example '(CatalogImport)' but does not significantly enhance meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Filters background job logs strictly by a specific job ID/name', using a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from sibling tools like search_job_logs which likely have broader scope.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies use case (filtering by job name) but does not explicitly state when to use or not use this tool versus alternatives like search_job_logs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.