Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Refactor MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enhances AI agents by providing deep semantic understanding of codebases, enabling more intelligent interactions through advanced code search and contextual awareness.
      90
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools to find regex pattern positions in files and list allowed directories, enabling text analysis with LSP-like functionality.
      2
      2 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for code modification and generation via Large Language Models, allowing users to create, modify, rewrite, and delete files using structured XML instructions.
      12
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server providing file search and question tools for AI models. Enables keyword search in files with line numbers and integration with external chat services.
      334 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A robust, language-agnostic Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides AI coding agents with the ability to edit files surgically via Abstract Syntax Trees (AST) instead of relying on token-heavy, brittle search-and-replace or diff operations.
      28
      9
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables coding agents to search for and record software issue fixes with semantic search using natural language queries.
      -

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    The two tools have clearly distinct purposes: code_refactor modifies code by replacing patterns, while code_search only finds patterns and returns locations. There is no overlap in functionality, making it impossible to confuse them.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Both tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'code_' as a prefix and descriptive suffixes ('refactor' and 'search'). The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the set.

    Tool Count2/5

    With only 2 tools, the server feels thin for a 'Refactor MCP' domain. While the tools cover basic search and replace operations, typical refactoring workflows might require more operations like rename, extract method, or analyze dependencies, leaving the surface incomplete.

    Completeness2/5

    The toolset is severely incomplete for a refactoring domain. It lacks essential operations such as renaming identifiers, extracting functions or variables, analyzing code structure, or handling refactoring across multiple files. Agents will face dead ends when attempting complex refactoring tasks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues