fetch_broker_order_status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. The description only states 'status' without specifying what the response contains, whether it is read-only, authentication requirements, or any side effects. This is insufficient for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but lacks necessary detail. Being brief is not conciseness if it omits critical information. Score 3 for a reasonable length that could be improved.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has one parameter, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should compensate by explaining return values, error conditions, or usage context. It fails to do so, leaving the agent with insufficient information. Score 2 for incomplete coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has one parameter (order_id) with 0% description coverage. The description adds only 'by id' which does not provide additional semantics beyond the parameter name. It does not specify the expected format or any constraints. Score 2 for marginal added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Status of a broker order by id' which indicates a clear verb-resource combination: fetching status. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like fetch_order_history or list_pending_live_orders, which may also retrieve order status. Score 4 for clear purpose but lacking sibling distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus other order-related tools such as fetch_order_history or list_pending_live_orders. There is no mention of prerequisites or alternatives. Score 2 for implicit usage only.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.