Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
trading-mcp-server

trading-mcp-server

by mukul8896
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

check_portfolio_concentration

Evaluate concentration risk across open paper positions to identify overexposure and manage portfolio diversification.

Instructions

Concentration check across open paper positions.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "check_portfolio_concentration"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It merely states a 'concentration check' without disclosing whether it is read-only, destructive, or any side effects. The agent cannot infer safety or reversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: one short sentence. While efficient, it lacks structure (e.g., separating purpose from behavior). Still, it is not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, and the description does not explain what the tool returns (e.g., a boolean, a string, a numeric value). For a zero-parameter tool, the description should at least specify the output format or meaning.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, so schema coverage is vacuously 100%. The description adds no parameter info, but since none exist, a baseline of 3 is appropriate. Additional details about output or behavior would improve this.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly indicates it checks concentration across open paper positions, specifying verb and resource. However, 'concentration' is somewhat vague and does not differentiate well from sibling 'calculate_portfolio_exposure' which may serve a similar purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'calculate_portfolio_exposure' or 'fetch_paper_portfolio'. The description lacks context for appropriate invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools