update_profile_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states that the items array is replaced, but fails to disclose idempotency, error handling, permission requirements, or side effects. The limited transparency is insufficient for safe invocation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While the description is a single sentence, it is too terse and omits crucial information. It is front-loaded with the action but sacrifices completeness for brevity, making it less useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema and three required parameters, the description provides no context on return values, error cases, or parameter constraints. It is grossly incomplete for a tool that mutates data.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. However, it only mentions 'items array' indirectly and does not clarify the role of `body` (an arbitrary object), `page_id`, or `profile_id`. This severe lack of parameter semantics would confuse an AI agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the action as 'Patch a profile page' and specifies that supplied items replace the page's items array. It distinguishes updates from reads (get_profile_page) and provides specific behavior, but could be more precise about what the body parameter may contain beyond items.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, when not to use it, or contrast with related tools like create_profile_page (if it exists) or get_profile_page.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.