Google Tasks MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Google Tasks MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to manage Google Tasks, including creating, updating, deleting, and searching tasks and task lists via OAuth2 authentication.22 npm1Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that integrates with TickTick task management service, allowing AI assistants to list, create, update, and complete tasks with proper timezone handling.95MIT
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude with Google Tasks, allowing users to manage task lists and tasks directly through Claude interface.1573 npm49MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript implementation of Model Context Protocol that provides integration tools for JIRA ticket creation and TODO management, allowing users to manage tasks through natural language interfaces.63 npmISC
- AlicenseAqualityFmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants to interact with TickTick/Dida365 task management API, supporting operations like creating, reading, updating, and deleting tasks and projects.119 npm35MIT
- FlicenseCqualityDmaintenanceA TypeScript template for building Model Context Protocol servers that implements basic note-taking CRUD operations with JSON responses.51-
TDQS
Scored across 4 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific CRUD operations for tasks: list_tasks retrieves, create_task adds, complete_task updates status, and delete_task removes. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (e.g., list_tasks, create_task, complete_task, delete_task). The naming is uniform and predictable throughout the set.
With 4 tools, the count is reasonable for a task management server, covering core operations. It is slightly lean but functional; minor additions like updating task details could enhance it without being necessary.
The toolset provides essential CRUD coverage for tasks (list, create, update via complete, delete), but lacks a dedicated update tool for modifying task details like title or notes. This minor gap is workable for basic workflows.