Which integrations are available for this server?

Built with TypeScript for type-safe development, allowing creation of robust MCP tools with proper typing and improved code reliability. Integrates with Vitest for testing the MCP server functionality, enabling test-driven development of the note management capabilities.

How do I use Simple TypeScript MCP Server?

1. Click on "Install Server". 2. Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state. 3. In the chat, type @ followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@Simple TypeScript MCP Server create a note about meeting tomorrow at 2pm" That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed. Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.

de en es ja ko ru zh

Simple TypeScript MCP Server

by jasonkneen

Overview Schema Related Servers Score Discussions

TypeScript

Hybrid

Simple TypeScript MCP Server

A simple TypeScript template for building Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers with basic CRUD operations. This template provides a foundation for creating MCP tools that return JSON responses.

Features

Simple notes API with CRUD operations
In-memory data storage
TypeScript implementation
JSON responses
Ready for testing with Vitest

Related MCP server: MCP Server Starter

Setup

npm install

Running the server

npm run dev

Building for production

npm run build
npm start

Available Tools

This template includes the following MCP tools:

getNote: Retrieve a note by ID
getAllNotes: Get all notes
createNote: Create a new note
updateNote: Update an existing note
deleteNote: Delete a note by ID

Testing

Run the tests with:

npm test

Or watch mode:

npm run test:watch

Customizing

You can use this template as a starting point for your own MCP server by modifying the tools in src/server.ts to fit your needs.

Available Tools

5 tools

createNoteD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`title`	Yes	The title of the note
`content`	Yes	The content of the note

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

deleteNoteD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`noteId`	Yes	The ID of the note to delete

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

getAllNotesD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No parameters

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

getNoteD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`noteId`	Yes	The ID of the note to retrieve

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

updateNoteD

ParametersJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`noteId`	Yes	The ID of the note to update
`title`	No	The updated title of the note
`content`	No	The updated content of the note

TDQS

D1/5.0

Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Tool has no description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness1/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Tool has no description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has no description.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Tool has no description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose1/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Tool has no description.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Tool has no description.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Tool Schema Changelog

Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

1 tool updatev1.0.0Jan 3, 2026
- ChangedgetAllNotes1 field changed
  - removedInput schema / additionalProperties
```
Removed value: -false
```
5 tool updatesAug 15, 2025
- First observedcreateNote
- First observeddeleteNote
- First observedgetAllNotes
- First observedgetNote
- First observedupdateNote

Install Server

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

TDQS

C2.2/5.0

Disambiguation5/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: createNote, deleteNote, getAllNotes, getNote, and updateNote cover different CRUD operations on notes. The action (create, delete, get, update) and scope (all vs. single) make them easily distinguishable.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent verbNoun pattern in camelCase (e.g., createNote, deleteNote). The naming is uniform across all five tools, with no deviations in style or convention.

Tool Count5/5

With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for managing notes, covering essential CRUD operations. Each tool serves a clear purpose without redundancy, making the count appropriate for the domain.

Completeness5/5

The tool set provides complete CRUD coverage for notes: create, read (get and getAll), update, and delete. There are no obvious gaps, as all lifecycle operations are included, allowing agents to handle full workflows without dead ends.

Maintenance

ActivityInactive

ResponsivenessNo issues

Resources

GitHub Repository

Need Help?

Related Servers

Unclaimed servers have limited discoverability.

Looking for Admin?

If you are the server author, to access and configure the admin panel.

Related MCP Connectors

devbrother2024-typescript-mcp-server-boilerplateOAuth
ai.smithery
Kickstart development with a customizable TypeScript template featuring sample tools for greeting,…
Developer Tools Code Execution Coding Agents
22
cortexpad A
com.cortexpad
Google Keep-style notes app with an MCP server for AI agents to read/write notes.
Note Taking Knowledge & Memory
162
smithery-ai-cookbook-ts-smithery-cli
ai.smithery
A simple Typescript MCP server built using the official MCP Typescript SDK and smithery/cli. This…
Developer Tools
213
hithereiamaliff-mcp-nextcloudOAuth
ai.smithery
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants to interact with yo…
Cloud Storage File Systems Workplace & Productivity
237

Related MCP Servers

MCP Server
Note Taking Text Summarization Content Management Systems
seonglae
A
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
This TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage a simple notes system through creating and summarizing text notes using Model Context Protocol (MCP).
Updated 7 months ago (2026-02-04 18:50 UTC)
2,013
8
MIT
MCP Server Starter
Developer Tools Code Execution Autonomous Agents
StevenStavrakis
A
license
C
quality
D
maintenance
A production-ready template for creating Model Context Protocol servers with TypeScript, providing tools for efficient testing, development, and deployment.
Updated 2 years ago (2025-01-19 15:14 UTC)
1
89
47
MIT
Notes MCP Server
Note Taking Text Summarization
HeatherFlux
F
license
Not graded
quality
D
maintenance
A TypeScript-based MCP server that enables users to manage text notes with features like note creation and summary generation using a Model Context Protocol.
Updated 2 years ago (2025-01-31 04:00 UTC)
1
-
Drupal-Modules-MCP MCP Server
Note Taking Text Summarization Developer Tools
Cleversoft-IT
A
license
B
quality
D
maintenance
This TypeScript-based MCP server allows users to manage and interact with a note system through Model Context Protocol, enabling note creation and summarization with URIs and metadata.
Updated 2 years ago (2025-02-07 18:51 UTC)
1
MIT

Latest Blog Posts

Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)
By Om-Shree-0709 on July 25, 2026.
mcp
Agent Identity
OAuth 2.1
Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an Intern
By Om-Shree-0709 on July 2, 2026.
Agent Identity
MCP Security
OAuth Delegation
Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)
By Om-Shree-0709 on June 30, 2026.
Agentic Ai
Prompt Injection
WebAssembly

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/jasonkneen/mcp-server-ts-template'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server