Skip to main content
Glama
mshegolev

sonarqube-mcp

by mshegolev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to sonarqube-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • sonarqube-mcp

      metalralf
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that exposes SonarQube data as AI agent tools, enabling project discovery, quality gates, measures, issues, hotspots, rule explanations, source code, and raw API access.
      4
      -

    • SonarQube MCP Server

      anggakawa
      F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that provides AI assistants with structured access to SonarQube projects, issues, metrics, and rules. It enables safe analysis of code quality and security findings through a set of validated, safety-first tools.
      6
      -

    • sonarqube-mcp-py

      filhocf
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Python MCP server for SonarQube, enabling AI agents to query projects, issues, quality gates, coverage, and security hotspots.
      13
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.5/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct SonarQube operation: listing projects, searching issues, fetching single-project metrics, checking quality gate status, and ranking projects by a metric. No overlap in purpose.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    All tools have a 'sonarqube_' prefix, but the suffix pattern is inconsistent: 'get_issues' and 'list_projects' follow verb_noun, while 'project_metrics', 'quality_gate_status', and 'worst_metrics' use noun-based names. This mixed convention may cause confusion.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, the server is well-scoped for SonarQube interaction. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or clutter.

    Completeness4/5

    The set covers essential read operations (projects, issues, metrics, quality gate, ranking). Minor gaps exist, such as no tool for listing all metric keys or performing write operations, but these are reasonable omissions for a focused MCP server.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources