confluence_get_page_children

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=true. The description aligns with these but adds no extra behavioral details (e.g., pagination behavior, error handling). Given that annotations cover safety and idempotency, a score of 3 is appropriate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 7-word sentence that directly conveys the core function. It is front-loaded and contains no extraneous words, earning each word's place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the detailed input schema and presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently states the tool's purpose. It could mention pagination or return format, but the schema likely covers these. No critical gaps are present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description itself adds no parameter information. However, the input schema provides clear descriptions for all parameters (page_id, limit, offset, response_format). With 100% schema description coverage, a baseline of 3 is correct.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (list) and resource (child pages of a Confluence page), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like confluence_get_page or confluence_search. It is specific and uses a verb+resource structure, but could mention immediate children vs all descendants.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Sibling tools such as confluence_get_page (for a single page) or confluence_search (for broad search) exist, but the description does not differentiate or provide context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.