F
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceMCP server for managing GitLab repositories — merge requests, pipelines, branches, and file operations.
1
-
gitlab-ci-mcp
by mshegolev
Related Servers
Alternatives to gitlab-ci-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for interacting with GitLab API, supporting both self-hosted instances and gitlab.com. Provides tools for managing issues, merge requests, code review, pipelines, milestones, releases, search, and file access.1,908 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the GitLab REST API providing tools to manage projects, merge requests, pipelines, CI/CD variables, approvals, issues, and code reviews.7MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for GitLab REST API enabling AI agents to manage pipelines, merge requests, diffs, and local reviews.159 npmMIT
- -licenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP Server for the GitLab API, enabling project management, file operations, and more.95,950 npm91,952MIT
- FlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for GitLab that enables AI assistants to manage CI pipelines, job logs, repositories, branches, merge requests, and commits via the GitLab REST API.20-
TDQS
A4/5.0
Scored across 24 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Tools are clearly separated by resource and action: pipeline tools split into list/get/jobs/log/trigger/retry/cancel/health, MR tools into list/get/changes/create/merge, and schedule CRUD is explicit. The only mild overlap is among pipeline-read tools, but the descriptions make boundaries clear.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a predictable gitlab_verb_noun pattern such as gitlab_get_pipeline, gitlab_list_branches, and gitlab_create_schedule. Exceptions include noun-phrase names like gitlab_pipeline_health and gitlab_project_info, the abbreviated gitlab_merge_mr, and the meta gitlab_ci_mcp_check_updates.
Tool Count4/5
At 24 tools the set is on the heavy side, but it covers several distinct areas—pipeline operations, job logs, merge requests, repository browsing, and schedules—and most tools have a clear role. The lone meta update-check tool is slightly out of place but does not dominate the surface.
Completeness3/5
Core CI lifecycle coverage is strong: pipelines can be listed, inspected, triggered, retried, cancelled, and health-checked, and schedules have full CRUD. However, notable gaps remain: merge requests cannot be updated, closed, commented on, or approved; branches and tags are list-only; and repository file operations are read-only.
Maintenance
ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessNo recent community issues