allure_get_test_results

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive. The description adds detailed return structure (fields like id, name, status, duration_ms, error truncated to 300 chars) and pagination behavior, surpassing what annotations offer.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is concise and well-structured: purpose sentence, Args with bullet-like notation, Returns dict, Examples, and exclusion note. No wasted words, and critical information is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 4 parameters, an output schema, and sibling tools, the description covers all aspects: parameter details, return format, usage hints, and alternatives. It enables correct invocation without gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds meaning by linking launch_id to another tool's output, explaining page is 0-based, size limits, and providing real-world examples. That justifies a 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it retrieves individual test results filtered by status, with a specific verb 'Get' and resource 'test results inside a launch'. It distinguishes from sibling 'allure_search_failed_tests' by noting that sibling handles FAILED+BROKEN together.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when not to use (for FAILED+BROKEN) and points to alternative 'allure_search_failed_tests'. Also provides examples clarifying common use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.