MCP FHIR Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP FHIR Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables seamless integration with FHIR APIs for healthcare applications, allowing users to search, retrieve, create, update, and analyze clinical information through natural language interactions. Supports SMART-on-FHIR authentication and works with various healthcare systems like EPIC and HAPI FHIR servers.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables LLM-based agents to interact with FHIR healthcare data through natural language prompts, providing full CRUD operations on FHIR resources, document processing, and semantic search capabilities.13100MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables LLMs to securely interact with FHIR healthcare servers and HL7 terminology services. Provides comprehensive healthcare data operations with built-in PHI protection, audit logging, and SMART on FHIR authentication.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceProvides seamless integration with FHIR APIs, enabling AI/LLM tools to search, retrieve, and analyze clinical healthcare data with support for SMART-on-FHIR authentication and multiple transport protocols.7116 PyPI136Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to securely interact with FHIR R4-based EMRs, supporting read, search, create, and update operations on any FHIR resource type across systems like Epic, Cerner, and OpenEMR.285 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI applications to securely search and manage healthcare data from FHIR R4-compliant servers with built-in safety validation for AI-generated clinical observations, preventing recording of physiologically impossible values.9 npm48 PyPIMIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes, but get_fhir_config overlaps slightly with general FHIR operations as it's a configuration tool rather than a core FHIR resource operation. The other tools (read, search, write, get_patient_zus_upid) are clearly differentiated by their specific actions and targets.
Tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (get_fhir_config, read_fhir_resource, search_fhir_resources, write_fhir_resource), with get_patient_zus_upid being a minor deviation due to its Zus-specific naming. Overall, the naming is predictable and readable.
Five tools is reasonable for a FHIR server, covering core operations like read, search, and write, plus configuration and a Zus-specific utility. It's slightly thin for full FHIR coverage but well-scoped for basic interactions.
The toolset covers read, search, and write operations, but lacks update and delete for full CRUD lifecycle management. The inclusion of get_fhir_config and a Zus-specific tool adds utility, but the absence of update/delete operations is a notable gap for FHIR resource management.