bosch_camera_friends_remove

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description discloses destructive behavior (removes entirely) and return format, going beyond basic purpose. It does not cover authentication or reversibility, but it is transparent about side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-loaded with key information and no unnecessary words. Highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, side effects, and return format, but lacks parameter documentation and prerequisites (e.g., 'friend_id must exist'). Adequate for a simple tool but incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the required 'friend_id' parameter (e.g., how to obtain it or its format). No added value beyond the schema structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Remove a friend entirely' with specific side effects (revokes shares, deletes invitation/friendship), which distinguishes it from sibling tools like friends_invite, friends_share, etc.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this is for final removal but does not explicitly say when to use it vs alternatives like friends_unshare. No when-not or comparative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.