Skip to main content
Glama
mosandlt

Bosch Smart Home Camera MCP Server

by mosandlt
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Bosch Smart Home Camera MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • 米家 MCP Server

      javen-yan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of Xiaomi smart home devices through MCP, focusing on homes, rooms, device names, and scenes without requiring protocol details.
      69
      MIT

    • Loxone MCP Server

      reijosirila
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables natural language control of Loxone smart home systems, including lighting, audio, climate, and environmental monitoring, through MCP-compatible clients.
      7 npm
      2
      AGPL 3.0

    • mcp-smart-home-server

      mahi080808
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible AI clients to safely control Home Assistant devices and query MQTT sensors through natural language, using allowlist-guarded actions and pre-defined automations.
      MIT

    • camera-mcp

      nokorishiro
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for controlling USB-connected DSLR cameras (e.g., Canon EOS 6D) via natural language, with features like capture, exposure settings, and autonomous timelapse with feedback-based auto exposure.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 70 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools are distinct get/set pairs for specific features, but there are genuinely close pairs: bosch_camera_snapshot vs bosch_camera_mjpeg_snapshot, the darkness_threshold concept appearing in both lighting_schedule_set and darkness_threshold_set, and several LED/light/privacy tools that share prefixes. The detailed descriptions help, but 70 tools with a few overlapping domains still create meaningful misselection risk.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The dominant pattern is bosch_camera_<feature>_get/_set, and the uniform prefix is helpful. However, many read-only tools use bare nouns instead of _get (events, status, wifi, feature_flags, snapshot, stream_url), and similar features are inconsistently named (light_set vs lighting_schedule_set, status_led_get vs led_brightness_get). The naming is readable but mixes conventions.

    Tool Count1/5

    70 tools is far beyond a workable MCP surface and well past the 50+ extreme cutoff. Every camera setting has its own narrow get/set pair, which fragments the API and makes selection expensive for an agent. This would be much more coherent if related features were grouped into broader tools, e.g. one lighting tool instead of five.

    Completeness4/5

    The server covers the core camera lifecycle very thoroughly: discovery, status, snapshots, streaming, privacy, motion, audio, lighting, firmware, rules, friends, and maintenance. There are minor gaps such as no cloud clip retrieval despite events reporting has_clip, and a few set-only operations with no corresponding getter (notifications, spotlight state). These are workable but prevent a perfect score.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources