Skip to main content
Glama
monoxide-xen

microcap-mcp

by monoxide-xen
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to microcap-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • ltspice-mcp

      ossenna-hq
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects LLM assistants to LTspice/ngspice circuit simulation, enabling design, verification, and iteration on schematics and netlists with structured numeric results.
      49
      GPL 3.0

    • ltspice-mcp

      Cognitohazard
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that connects LLM assistants to real circuit simulation: LTspice and ngspice, plus direct editing of LTspice .asc schematics. Simulation results come back as structured numbers so the assistant can design, verify, and iterate on circuits.
      48
      213 PyPI
      43
      GPL 3.0

    • ltspice-mcp

      xuio
      F
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for automating LTspice on macOS, enabling simulation, schematic generation, data extraction, verification, and rendering via natural language or agents.
      71
      19
      -

    • SPICEBridge

      clanker-lover
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      AI-powered circuit design through simulation — an MCP server that gives language models direct access to SPICE circuit simulation via ngspice, enabling natural language circuit description and automated netlist generation, simulation, measurement, and spec verification.
      28
      33
      GPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.9/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Several tools have overlapping names and purposes: simulate, simulate_schematic, and simulate_example are all 'run a simulation' tools with different input formats, and plot and plot_schematic similarly differ only by input type. The descriptions clearly distinguish them, but an agent relying on names alone could easily misselect.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The naming pattern is predominantly verb_noun with underscores (generate_amplifier, simulate_schematic, describe_example), which is consistent. A few single-word verbs (simulate, sweep, plot) deviate slightly but remain predictable and readable.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 20 tools, the server is slightly over the ideal 3-15 range but each tool serves a distinct purpose in the circuit simulation workflow. The count is justifiable given the breadth of generation, simulation, visualization, and example-library access, though a few generators could potentially be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers the core lifecycle: generate circuits, simulate via netlist or schematic, plot results, and access reference examples. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit schematic editing tool (text editing is expected instead) and no Monte Carlo or corner analysis, but the main workflows are well supported.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources