Deploy MONA Agent trên MONA Cloud

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare the safety profile (readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, openWorldHint=true), but the description adds genuinely useful context beyond them: it discloses that the tool currently returns a clear stub status, and that sandbox mode costs nothing and needs no wallet. It does not say what a real (non-sandbox) deployment does or whether it is reversible, but the stub caveat is meaningful behavioral information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and every clause carries information, but the fragmentary phrasing ('Slot runtime agent wave kế tiếp') is cryptic and the important stub caveat is not front-loaded or clearly separated from the slotting statement.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema, the description at least explains that it returns stub status and hints that non-sandbox use requires a wallet. However, it leaves the template parameter, the real deployment outcome, and the relationship to sibling deploy tools unexplained, so it is only minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50%, and the description's sandbox clause ('sandbox=true: thử 0đ, không cần ví') is a verbatim copy of the sandbox property's schema description, so it adds zero meaning. The required 'template' parameter, which only has a regex pattern, is never explained in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title says 'Deploy MONA Agent trên MONA Cloud', but the description never states a clear verb+resource like 'deploys an agent'; instead it says 'Slot runtime agent wave kế tiếp', which is ambiguous about whether it deploys, schedules, or queues an agent. It does not distinguish itself from close siblings such as agent_deploy, vibecloud_agent_deploy, or agent_templates_get.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only usage hint is 'sandbox=true: thử 0đ, không cần ví', which applies to one parameter value rather than telling the agent when to pick this tool over agent_deploy or vibecloud_agent_deploy. No preconditions, no exclusions, and no alternative routing is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.