delete_document
Remove a previously ingested document from the knowledge base by providing its unique document ID.
Instructions
Delete an ingested document by its doc_id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Remove a previously ingested document from the knowledge base by providing its unique document ID.
Delete an ingested document by its doc_id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| doc_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. The description does not mention permanence, permissions, side effects, or irreversibility, leaving agents without critical safety information.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is one short sentence with no wasted words. However, it could include more detail without becoming verbose. It is concise but not maximally informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has a single parameter and no output schema, but it performs a destructive action. The description lacks completeness by not explaining deletion behavior, reversibility, or what happens to associated data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description merely restates that the tool uses doc_id, adding no meaning beyond the schema. For a single parameter, the description should clarify what doc_id refers to, constraints, or examples.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete), resource (document), and identifier (doc_id). It is specific and distinguishable from sibling tools like list_documents or restore_version.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or when not to use. The description only states the basic function without contextual advice.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/moliver28/corpus-kb'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server