create_branch
Create a new branch to manage corpus versions, optionally starting from a specific version.
Instructions
Create a new branch from an optional version.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| branch_name | Yes | ||
| from_version | No |
Create a new branch to manage corpus versions, optionally starting from a specific version.
Create a new branch from an optional version.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| branch_name | Yes | ||
| from_version | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must cover behavioral traits. It only mentions optional version input but does not disclose naming constraints, permission requirements, side effects, or what happens upon creation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff. However, the brevity sacrifices essential detail for an agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a 2-parameter creation tool without output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return value, error conditions, or what 'branch' means in this context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0% and description only hints at 'from_version' being optional, leaving 'branch_name' completely unexplained. No constraints, format, or examples provided.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (create branch) and the optional version parameter. It is specific and distinguishes from listing or switching branches, but does not explicitly differentiate from siblings like 'checkout_version'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. With many sibling tools (list_branches, switch_branch, checkout_version), the agent lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/moliver28/corpus-kb'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server