A
licenseNot graded
qualityF
maintenanceNode.js server implementing Model Context Protocol (MCP) for filesystem operations, enabling read/write files, directory management, search, and metadata retrieval via SSE transport.
647,066 npm
17
MIT
Filesystem MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to Filesystem MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceNode.js server implementing Model Context Protocol (MCP) for filesystem operations with comprehensive permission controls, allowing secure file and directory manipulation with granular access restrictions.21647,066 npm3-
- -licenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceNode.js server implementing Model Context Protocol (MCP) for filesystem operations, allowing AI systems to read, write, edit files and manage directories within specified allowed paths.647,066 npm-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceGo server implementing Model Context Protocol (MCP) for filesystem operations.690MIT
- -licenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceA comprehensive Node.js server implementing Model Context Protocol (MCP) that enables filesystem operations, process management, and terminal session handling with an enterprise-grade security approach.14647,066 npm-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEducational MCP server for basic file operations (read/write) via the Model Context Protocol.-
TDQS
A3.6/5.0
Scored across 14 tools
Disambiguation3/5
Some tools overlap in purpose: list_directory and list_directory_with_sizes are nearly identical except for size output; read_file is deprecated in favor of read_text_file, causing confusion. Other tools are distinct but descriptions could be clearer to avoid misselection.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow a verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_directory, edit_file, read_text_file). directory_tree is a minor deviation as noun_noun. Overall consistent with one exception.
Tool Count5/5
14 tools is well-scoped for a filesystem server. Each tool serves a clear purpose, covering reading, writing, editing, listing, searching, and metadata retrieval without unnecessary bloat.
Completeness2/5
Missing critical operations: there is no tool to delete files or directories, and no copy functionality. This creates significant gaps that will hinder agents from performing basic file management tasks.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSlow