xserver-files-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to xserver-files-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceA secure file management MCP server enabling file operations like listing, reading, creating, renaming, moving, copying, deleting, and searching within a restricted workspace.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceSSH-based MCP server that enables remote execution of SSH commands, file transfers, and secure server management via the MCP protocol.ISC
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA full-featured MCP server for local development with filesystem, shell, editor, session persistence, and security features.481 PyPI2MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server providing safe, sandboxed SFTP access to game servers for AI agents, enabling config editing, addon installation, and backups without shell access.MIT
- FlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA lightweight MCP server for basic file operations, enabling reading, writing, and listing files securely via the Model Context Protocol.31-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides secure access to local file system operations.-
TDQS
Scored across 13 tools
Most tools have clear distinct purposes (listing, reading, writing, backing up, configuring). However, pull_file_to_workspace overlaps with read_file (both read remote content) and push_file_from_workspace overlaps with write_file (both write remote), which could cause misselection without careful descriptions.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., list_files, read_file, write_file, set_domain_redirect). Even the longer names like pull_file_to_workspace and push_file_from_workspace maintain the pattern with clear prepositions, so the naming convention is uniform.
13 tools is well-scoped for a file management server covering configuration, file operations, backups, and workspace sync. Each tool addresses a specific need without unnecessary bloat, making the count appropriate for the domain.
The tool surface covers core file operations (create, read, update) and backups, but notably lacks a delete tool and directory management (mkdir/move/copy). This is a significant gap for a file management server, as agents cannot complete full file lifecycle workflows.