Skip to main content
Glama
mobile-next

Mobile Next MCP Server

Official
by mobile-next

Type Text

mobile_type_keys

Type text into the focused element on a specified iOS or Android device, optionally pressing Enter to submit.

Instructions

Type text into the focused element

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
textYesThe text to type
deviceYesThe device identifier to use. Use mobile_list_available_devices to find which devices are available to you.
submitYesWhether to submit the text. If true, the text will be submitted as if the user pressed the enter key.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.0.6
    • changedInput schema / $schema
      Previous value: -"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"New value: +"https://json-schema.org/draft/2020-12/schema"
  2. Changed3 schema fields changedv1.0.0
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • addedInput schema / properties / device
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "The device identifier to use. Use mobile_list_available_devices to find which devices are available to you.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "text",
      -  "submit"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "device",
      +  "text",
      +  "submit"
      +]
  3. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare this is a non-read-only, non-destructive, open-world operation, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds essentially nothing beyond that: it does not say what happens when no element is focused, whether typing appends or replaces, or how submission/errors behave.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence with zero filler, which is efficient. The terseness borders on under-specification rather than verbosity, but nothing is wasted.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

All three parameters are documented in the schema and annotations cover the safety profile, so the core is complete. Still missing is the focus precondition and error behavior, which matter for a tool that acts on whatever happens to be focused.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all three parameters documented in the schema, so the schema carries the semantic load and the baseline of 3 applies. The description restates the 'text' idea but adds no format, encoding, or device-selection detail beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and target: 'Type text into the focused element', which distinguishes it from sibling input tools like mobile_press_button and mobile_click_on_screen_at_coordinates. It does not, however, name those siblings or otherwise route the agent among them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, and no alternatives. It does not tell the agent that an element must first be focused (e.g., via a tap), nor when to prefer mobile_press_button for special keys instead.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.