Skip to main content
Glama
mobile-next

Mobile Next MCP Server

Official
by mobile-next

Related Servers

Alternatives to Mobile Next MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables scalable mobile automation for iOS and Android through a platform-agnostic interface, allowing LLMs to interact with mobile applications via accessibility snapshots or screenshot-based inputs.
      19
      59,714 npm
      2
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for mobile automation and development, offering a single API to control iOS and Android devices (simulators, emulators, real devices) through accessibility trees and coordinate-based interactions. It lets AI agents launch apps, tap, swipe, type, capture screenshots, and extract structured data from native mobile apps.
      23
      59,714 npm
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server for ad-hoc UI testing of Android and iOS apps, enabling LLM agents to interact with mobile app UIs and react to observations.
      40
      3 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for mobile automation that enables LLMs to interact with Android and iOS devices through screenshot, tap, swipe, log analysis, and app lifecycle management.
      32
      3 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI agents to control and automate Android devices through natural language, supporting actions like app management, UI interactions, and device monitoring.
      59
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 35 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools target clearly distinct resources or actions, and the descriptions explicitly separate local vs remote devices and tap variants. The main ambiguity is between mobile_take_screenshot and mobile_save_screenshot, whose boundary is not immediately obvious from the names.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Nearly all tools use the mobile_ prefix followed by snake_case verb/object phrasing, making the set predictable. Minor deviations exist in longer interaction names like mobile_click_on_screen_at_coordinates and in the screenshot pair take vs save.

    Tool Count2/5

    At 35 tools, the surface is well above the comfortable range and has many atomic interaction tools that increase selection cost. Although the mobile automation domain is broad, the set feels heavy and could be more tightly scoped or grouped.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is broad: device discovery/allocation, app lifecycle, UI interaction, screenshots, recording, logs, crashes, orientation, location, clipboard, and cloud devices are all represented. Minor gaps such as file transfer or permission management exist but are not core blockers.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessSlow