esq-builder-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to esq-builder-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables authors to automate publishing and managing their own Qimao (七猫) novel author-backend works through an MCP client, covering login and status, book creation and metadata, chapter add/edit/delete and batch publishing, short stories, read-only statistics and income, plus a local manuscript library, originality checks, and a genre knowledge base. Write operations follow a two-stage preview-then-confirm flow and it runs over stdio or Streamable HTTP with 30 tools and 8 read-only resources.3058 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables MCP hosts and agents to run structural and format checks on delivered artifacts and generate consolidated QC reports in JSON and Markdown, so issues can be surfaced and fixed before delivery.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceZero-dependency stdio bridge to Moltline Studio's fleet of 14 hosted MCP servers covering code review, time operations, data transforms, business ops, education, research, outreach and more. Free tier requires no registration; premium tools unlock with a license. Independently audited, MCPize Verified A.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables local-first SEO evidence tooling by analyzing Screaming Frog exports, running bounded live and infrastructure checks, and producing structured audits, task backlogs, and reports via CLI and MCP.4MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables creating and administering multiple quizzes, adding questions, registering participants, validating answers, reviewing responses, and managing leaderboards through MCP, accessible locally via stdio or remotely over HTTP.-
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables users to benchmark AI models across English, Urdu, and Roman Urdu by running question sets, grading answers, measuring confidently wrong and hedged responses, and producing reports, comparisons, and CSV exports through an MCP client or CLI.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
esq_build_package and esq_validate_package overlap slightly since build also validates, but the descriptions clarify that build produces a ZIP while validate is a standalone check used as a pre-upload step. esq_parse_wordlist and esq_hot_words both deal with word frequency but target clearly different inputs (wordlist JSONL vs passage text).
All tools share the esq_ prefix and mostly follow a verb_noun pattern (build_package, validate_package, upload_and_publish, parse_wordlist). esq_hot_words breaks the pattern as a bare noun phrase, a minor deviation.
Five tools is well-scoped for a package builder/publisher, and each tool earns its place in the build-validate-upload pipeline plus two auxiliary analysis utilities.
The core lifecycle (build, validate, upload/publish) is covered, and the word-frequency helpers round out the domain. Minor gaps exist for listing/managing previously built packages, but the primary workflow has no dead ends.