librarian
Related Servers
Alternatives to librarian
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives LLMs access to Wikipedia, supporting search, article retrieval, summaries, sections, and related topics across multiple languages and language variants.22MIT
- FlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA MCP server that allows you to search and retrieve content on any wiki site using MediaWiki with LLMs 🤖. wikipedia.org, fandom.com, wiki.gg and more sites using Mediawiki are supported!227-
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that retrieves information from Wikipedia to provide context to LLMs, allowing users to search articles, get summaries, full content, sections, and links from Wikipedia.223,850 PyPI297MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that retrieves and provides Wikipedia content for requested topics, enabling easy access to Wikipedia information directly through the Model Control Protocol.1-
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables web searching, URL content extraction, and summarization without requiring API keys. It also provides advanced mathematical evaluation and multi-language Wikipedia summary retrieval tools.5600 npm6MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server for Wiki.js projects that enables full-text search, page retrieval, and page management capabilities. It allows LLMs to interact with wiki content through specialized tools for searching, listing, and creating pages.-
TDQS
Scored across 5 tools
Multiple tools have unclear boundaries and overlapping purposes. get_wikipedia_page_info and get_wikipedia_page_summary both provide page information with unclear differentiation beyond 'detailed' vs 'quick summary'. get_wikipedia_page_sections and get_wikipedia_page_sections_info appear to serve nearly identical functions, with descriptions suggesting minimal distinction. This overlap will likely cause agent misselection.
All tools follow a perfectly consistent verb_noun pattern with clear, descriptive names. The naming convention is uniform across all five tools, using snake_case and starting with action verbs like 'get' or 'search'. This predictability makes it easy for agents to understand and select tools.
Five tools is a reasonable number for a Wikipedia-focused server, slightly on the lower end but well-scoped. The count feels appropriate for the domain, though it could potentially benefit from additional tools like editing or history functions. Each tool appears to serve a distinct purpose within the limited scope, making the count appropriate.
The tool surface covers basic Wikipedia retrieval operations but has notable gaps. While it provides good read capabilities (info, sections, summary, search), there's no coverage for write operations, page history, or user interactions that might be expected in a comprehensive Wikipedia interface. The surface is functional but incomplete for full Wikipedia interaction.