Skip to main content
Glama
mlava

Scholar Sidekick

Audit Bibliography

auditBibliography
Read-onlyIdempotent

Verify an entire bibliography in one call: check each reference for mismatched titles, fake identifiers, and retractions, then return per-entry verdicts and a summary.

Instructions

Verify a WHOLE bibliography in one call — the batch counterpart to verifyCitation. Each entry runs the same fabrication check (real, resolvable identifier paired with a title that does NOT match the resolved paper; Topaz et al., Lancet 2026) plus a retraction lookup, and the tool returns a per-entry verdict table and a corpus summary. Use when the user pastes a reference list, a .bib / .ris file, or asks to 'check all these citations at once' / 'audit my bibliography' / 'which of these references are fake or retracted'. Input: EITHER bibliography (raw BibTeX / RIS / CSL-JSON text — format auto-detected) OR claims (an array of pre-parsed {title + identifier} objects), not both. Capped at 25 entries per call; excess is dropped and reported via truncated. checks defaults to ['retraction'] (pass [] to skip); semanticTitle opt-in per entry (any tier; catches one-word title swaps, flagged → 'ambiguous' for review); screenWithLlm opt-in per entry (same auth gating as verifyCitation). Returns: { format, entries: [{ index, sourceKey?, status: 'ok'|'error', verdict: 'matched' | 'mismatch' | 'not_found' | 'ambiguous', confidence, matched, mismatches, retraction: { checked, doi, isRetracted, hasCorrections, hasConcern, notices } | null, provenance }], parseErrors: [{ index, error, message }], truncated, summary: { total, matched, mismatch, ambiguous, not_found, errored, retracted } }. Reading the result: index is 1-BASED (entry 1 is the first reference) — do not add 1 again when reporting it. sourceKey is the entry's own key in the source file (BibTeX cite key, RIS ID, CSL-JSON id) and is the reliable way to point a user at the offending reference; it is absent on the claims[] path. entries and parseErrors share one index space, so a given input position appears in exactly one of them — report parseErrors as UNCHECKED, never as clean. summary.total counts verifiable entries only, excluding parseErrors and anything past the cap; summary.retracted is a separate axis from the verdict counts (an entry can be both matched and retracted), so never sum those fields. A non-zero truncated means the audit is incomplete — split the bibliography and call again. Per-entry leniency: one entry that fails to resolve becomes status:'error' without failing the batch. This audits citation IDENTITY (does each identifier resolve to the claimed work, and is it retracted) — it does NOT check whether a source supports the claim it is cited for. Read-only and idempotent. Works anonymously for the non-LLM path; SCHOLAR_API_KEY (a free ssk key from https://scholar-sidekick.com/account) or a paid RapidAPI tier raises rate limits and enables the optional LLM screen.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
checksNoPer-entry enrichment checks. Defaults to ['retraction'] (flags retracted / corrected / expression-of-concern works via Crossref + Retraction Watch, keyed on each resolved DOI). Pass [] to skip.
claimsNoPre-parsed citations to audit — an alternative to `bibliography` for agents that already hold structured references. Each needs a `title` plus whatever identifiers the citation carries.
formatNoOverride format auto-detection for `bibliography`.
bibliographyNoRaw bibliography text to parse and audit — BibTeX, RIS, or CSL-JSON. Provide EITHER this or `claims`, not both. Format is auto-detected; override with `format`. Capped at 25 entries per call (excess dropped, reported via `truncated`).
screenWithLlmNoOpt-in Stage 3 LLM screen applied per entry (same gating as verifyCitation). Default false.
semanticTitleNoOpt-in semantic title check applied per entry (any tier; see verifyCitation). Default false.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv0.8.13
    • addedInput schema / properties / semanticTitle
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Opt-in semantic title check applied per entry (any tier; see verifyCitation). Default false.",
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  2. Changed12 schema fields changedv0.8.11
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / ads / description
      Added value: +"NASA ADS bibcode, e.g. '2019A&A...625A.135L'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / arxiv / description
      Added value: +"arXiv ID, e.g. '2301.00001' or 'arXiv:2301.00001'."
    • changedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / author / description
      Previous value: -"First-author family name as cited."New value: +"First-author family name as cited. Refines the comparison; a disagreement here can downgrade a verdict to 'ambiguous'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / container / description
      Added value: +"Journal or book title as cited. Refinement only, same role as `year`."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / doi / description
      Added value: +"DOI as cited, with or without a prefix ('10.1038/nphys1170' or a doi.org URL)."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / isbn / description
      Added value: +"ISBN-10 or ISBN-13; hyphens are tolerated."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / issn / description
      Added value: +"ISSN of the containing journal. Identifies a container, not a paper, so it cannot resolve an entry on its own — supply it alongside another identifier."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / pmcid / description
      Added value: +"PubMed Central ID, e.g. 'PMC1234567'."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / pmid / description
      Added value: +"PubMed ID, digits only or 'PMID:' prefixed."
    • changedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / title / description
      Previous value: -"Title as cited. Required for each claim."New value: +"Title exactly as the citation claims it. Required — the audit compares this against the title of the record the identifier actually resolves to, and that comparison is the fabrication check."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / whoIrisUrl / description
      Added value: +"WHO IRIS publication URL."
    • addedInput schema / properties / claims / items / properties / year / description
      Added value: +"Publication year as cited. Refinement only — it never decides a verdict alone."
  3. Addedv0.8.3

TDQS

A4.8/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover readOnly/idempotent/destructive, but the description adds substantial beyond them: the 25-entry cap with truncation reporting, per-entry error leniency, anonymous vs SCHOLAR_API_KEY rate-limit behavior, the auth gating on screenWithLlm, and the meaning of truncated for audit completeness. This is rich behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core purpose, then usage triggers, then input contract, then result-reading guidance. It is long, but nearly every sentence carries operational weight (index base, sourceKey semantics, index space sharing, summary field caveats). Minor density that could be trimmed without loss.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex batch tool with no output schema, the description fully specifies the return shape, explains how to read index/sourceKey/parseErrors/truncated, warns against double-adding 1 and against summing overlapping summary fields, and states the scope boundary. An agent has everything needed to call and interpret it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description still adds value by clarifying the either/or relationship of `bibliography` vs `claims`, the default of `checks` and that [] skips it, and that `semanticTitle`/`screenWithLlm` are per-entry opt-ins with tier/auth implications. Slightly above baseline because it explains interactions the schema only implies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Verify a WHOLE bibliography') and immediately differentiates from the sibling verifyCitation as its batch counterpart. Names the exact checks performed (fabrication, retraction) and the input forms accepted. An agent can distinguish this from verifyCitation without opening either schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives explicit trigger conditions ('user pastes a reference list, a .bib/.ris file, or asks to check all these citations at once'). Also states an exclusion: it audits citation IDENTITY, NOT whether a source supports its claim. This is a model when-to-use section.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.