Skip to main content
Glama
mlava

Scholar Sidekick

Related Servers

Alternatives to Scholar Sidekick

  • A
    license
    B
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Retrieve citation data effortlessly from CiteAs and Google Scholar. Get BibTeX-formatted citations for your resources with just a few commands. Enhance your research workflow by integrating citation retrieval directly into your applications.
    2
    14
    MIT

Related Servers

  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables searching roughly 170 million scholarly works and resolving DOIs into normalized metadata, complete with citation formatting in any style, reference and citing-work snowballing, and author, journal, funder and topic profiles. It also extracts and verifies DOIs from messy text and exports bibliographies as BibTeX, RIS or CSL-JSON.
    11
    MIT
  • A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Papers by Ouroboros Apps (https://ouroborosapps.com). Research paper search with real citations from OpenAlex, Semantic Scholar, PubMed, Crossref, and arXiv: find papers, fetch abstracts, follow citations, and format references. Connect by pasting https://papers-mcp.vercel.app/mcp into Claude, Cursor, Grok, or ChatGPT developer mode (OAuth). Docs: https://ouroborosapps.com/docs/papers
    4 npm
    MIT
  • F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables resolving academic DOIs to canonical identifiers and generating BibTeX records via CrossRef, and can be integrated into MCP-compliant clients for automated research workflows.
    8
    -
  • A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables AI agents and LLM tools to verify academic citations against real literature, detect hallucinated references, retrieve authoritative metadata and DOIs, generate BibTeX/APA/IEEE citations, and search over 200M+ scientific publications via MCP tools.
    3
    17 npm
    MIT

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Scored across 7 tools

Disambiguation4/5

Each tool has a clearly distinct core purpose (single vs batch fabrication check, retraction, OA status, and three output forms of identifier resolution), and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference siblings to delineate boundaries. The only minor friction is between formatCitation and exportCitation with format=txt, which both produce a plain formatted citation string.

Naming Consistency5/5

All seven tools use a consistent camelCase verb_noun pattern: verifyCitation, auditBibliography, checkRetraction, checkOpenAccess, resolveIdentifier, formatCitation, exportCitation. There are no mixed conventions or vague verb choices.

Tool Count5/5

Seven tools is well-scoped: verification (single + batch), retraction, open access, resolution, and two output formats. Each tool earns its place with little redundancy for the citation/identifier domain.

Completeness4/5

The surface covers the citation lifecycle well: fabrication verification, retraction, OA lookup, metadata resolution, formatting, and export, with single/batch variants for the core checks. Minor gaps remain, such as no title-based discovery/search tool and no batch mode for checkRetraction/checkOpenAccess (must loop), though auditBibliography mitigates the batch retraction case.

Maintenance

ActivityMaintained
ResponsivenessUnresponsive