Skip to main content
Glama
mjpitz

RFC MCP Server

by mjpitz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to RFC MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • rfc-server

      xiaobenyang-com
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server for obtaining, parsing and reading RFC documents from the ietf.org website, providing programmatic interactive tools.
      3
      2
      Apache 2.0

    • MCP-Server-IETF

      tizee
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables Large Language Models to search and access IETF RFC documents with pagination support.
      3
      13
      MIT

    • mcp-rfc-editor

      daedalus
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      An MCP server for creating, loading, and editing RFC TXT documents using the rfc-editor Python library. It provides a suite of tools to manage document components including sections, abstracts, titles, and author metadata.
      29
      -

    • IETF RFC MCP Server

      acquo
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides LLM-based access to IETF documents such as RFCs, Internet-Drafts, STD/BCP/FYI series, and errata through a Model Context Protocol server.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: get_rfc retrieves a full document, get_rfc_section extracts a specific part, and search_rfcs finds documents by keyword. There is no overlap or ambiguity between these functions, making tool selection straightforward for an agent.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with snake_case (get_rfc, get_rfc_section, search_rfcs). The naming is predictable and readable, with no deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 3 tools, the server is well-scoped for its purpose of accessing RFC documents. Each tool earns its place by covering distinct aspects (fetching, sectioning, searching), and the count is appropriate without being too thin or heavy.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers core operations for RFC access: retrieving full documents, sections, and searching. A minor gap exists in lifecycle coverage, such as listing all RFCs or filtering by metadata, but agents can work around this with the provided tools.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources