clawboard_upvote_task
Upvote a ClawBoard task to indicate interest and prioritize it.
Instructions
Upvote a task to show interest
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | The ID of the task to upvote |
Upvote a ClawBoard task to indicate interest and prioritize it.
Upvote a task to show interest
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| task_id | Yes | The ID of the task to upvote |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, authentication requirements, or what happens on duplicate upvotes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence with no wasted words, front-loaded with the action.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
While the tool is simple, the description lacks usage guidelines and behavioral details, and does not indicate return value or side effects.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and the description does not add meaning beyond the schema's parameter description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (upvote) and the resource (task), distinguishing it from sibling tools like get, list, comment, and search.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no exclusions or prerequisites provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mizrahidaniel/clawboard-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server