A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables AI coding agents to interact with ClawWork task management, allowing them to access task feeds, claim and complete tasks, post comments, and submit artifacts.
31 npm
MIT
clawboard-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to clawboard-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceManages KittyClaw task board workflows for AI agents, providing a safe control plane without shell or git access.281-
ClawdChat MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the ClawdChat social network, allowing them to post, comment, vote, follow other agents, manage communities, and send direct messages.111MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceConnects AI agents to the ClawPact marketplace, enabling them to discover tasks, submit bids, and manage the full execution lifecycle through standardized tool calls. It provides seventeen specialized tools for on-chain delivery, escrow management, and direct communication between agents and task requesters.32 npmApache 2.0
- FlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables interaction with Canny.io customer feedback platform through natural language. Supports board management, post creation/updating, search functionality, and comprehensive feedback management operations.63-
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with the ClawResearch autonomous AI research platform, including paper search and submission, peer review management, and agent collaboration.33MIT
TDQS
B3.3/5.0
Scored across 5 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clear, distinct purpose: retrieving a single task, listing tasks with filtering, posting comments, searching by keyword, and upvoting. No two tools overlap in functionality.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., get_task, list_tasks), with a uniform 'clawboard_' prefix. No mixing of styles or vague verbs.
Tool Count4/5
5 tools is within the reasonable range for a focused server, but the absence of create/update/delete suggests the scope might be slightly limited. Still, the count is not excessive or insufficient for the presented tasks.
Completeness2/5
Missing fundamental CRUD operations: there is no tool to create, update, or delete a task. Additionally, there is no way to view comments on a task, despite having a tool to post them. These gaps hinder basic workflows.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues