Claude Prompts MCP Server
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP_PROMPTS_PATH | No | Path to your custom prompts directory only | |
| MCP_RESOURCES_PATH | No | Path to your custom resources directory (can contain: prompts/, gates/, methodologies/, styles/) |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": true
} |
| resources | {
"listChanged": true
} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| prompt_engineA | 🚀 PROMPT ENGINE [CAGEERF]: Execute prompts with C.A.G.E.E.R.F framework and ground-truth validation. WHAT IT RETURNS: Prepared prompt + CAGEERF phase instructions (Context→Analysis→Goals→Execution→Evaluation→Refinement). WHAT YOU DO: Execute each phase yourself using the returned structure. SYNTAX:
PRESETS: :fast (1 try), :full (5 tries), :extended (10 tries) MODIFIERS: %clean (no injection), %lean (gates only), %judge (preview) |
| system_controlD | ⚙️ SYSTEM CONTROL [CAGEERF]: System administration. Status shows current CAGEERF phase context. |
| resource_managerB | 🗂️ RESOURCE MANAGER [CAGEERF]: Unified CRUD for prompts, gates, and frameworks. USAGE: resource_manager(resource_type:"prompt|gate|framework", action:"...", ...) RESOURCE TYPES: prompt (templates), gate (quality criteria), framework (CAGEERF, ReACT, 5W1H, SCAMPER) ACTIONS: create | update | delete | list | inspect | reload | switch (framework only) Use action:"guide" with resource_type:"prompt" for phase-appropriate recommendations. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 3 tools
The three tools target distinct areas: prompt execution, system administration, and resource management. The only ambiguity is system_control, whose description is vague and could overlap with engine control, but overall the boundaries are clear enough.
All tool names use a consistent snake_case noun_noun format with a role suffix (engine, control, manager). While not a strict verb_noun pattern, the naming style is uniform and predictable across all three tools.
Three tools is at the lower end of appropriate for a focused server, and each tool serves a distinct purpose. The count is reasonable for the narrow domain, though a slightly larger set could add more convenience functions.
The set covers the full lifecycle: creating and managing resources via resource_manager, executing prompts via prompt_engine, and system-level status via system_control. Minor gaps include a dedicated inspection or debugging tool, but the core workflows are complete.