Skip to main content
Glama
minipuft

Claude Prompts MCP Server

by minipuft
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Claude Prompts MCP Server

  • n8n-MCP

    czlonkowski
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    A
    maintenance
    A Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants with comprehensive access to n8n node documentation, properties, and operations for effective workflow automation.
    28
    102,932 npm
    23,048
    MIT

  • Spec Workflow MCP

    Pimzino
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides structured spec-driven development workflow tools for AI-assisted software development with sequential spec creation (Requirements → Design → Tasks). Features a real-time web dashboard for monitoring project progress and managing development workflows.
    5
    494 npm
    4,301
    GPL 3.0

Related Servers

  • Prompt Refiner MCP

    TechQuanta
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    B
    maintenance
    Enables refining prompt intent, structure, constraints, and output instructions before prompts reach an LLM, with tools for schema retrieval, brief validation, and prompt variant generation.
    3
    MIT

  • MCP Prompts Server

    sparesparrow
    A
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    F
    maintenance
    Enables creation, management, and templating of prompts through a simplified SOLID architecture, allowing users to organize prompts by category and fill in templates at runtime.
    38 npm
    118
    MIT

  • Teleprompter

    raisinbread
    A
    license
    A
    quality
    C
    maintenance
    Enables storage and reuse of prompt templates with variable substitution for LLMs. Supports creating, searching, and retrieving prompt templates to avoid repeating complex instructions across conversations.
    4
    9 npm
    4
    MIT

  • Prompt Learning MCP Server

    curiositech
    F
    license
    Not graded
    quality
    D
    maintenance
    Provides stateful prompt optimization using research-backed techniques like APE and OPRO, learning from historical performance data via a vector database. It enables users to automatically refine prompts, retrieve high-performing examples, and track performance analytics through iterative feedback.
    5
    -
Deploy Server
Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

TDQS

B3/5.0

Scored across 3 tools

Disambiguation4/5

The three tools target distinct areas: prompt execution, system administration, and resource management. The only ambiguity is system_control, whose description is vague and could overlap with engine control, but overall the boundaries are clear enough.

Naming Consistency4/5

All tool names use a consistent snake_case noun_noun format with a role suffix (engine, control, manager). While not a strict verb_noun pattern, the naming style is uniform and predictable across all three tools.

Tool Count4/5

Three tools is at the lower end of appropriate for a focused server, and each tool serves a distinct purpose. The count is reasonable for the narrow domain, though a slightly larger set could add more convenience functions.

Completeness4/5

The set covers the full lifecycle: creating and managing resources via resource_manager, executing prompts via prompt_engine, and system-level status via system_control. Minor gaps include a dedicated inspection or debugging tool, but the core workflows are complete.

Maintenance

ActivityActive
ResponsivenessSlow

Resources