초안 발행

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the body is not passed again (saved content is used) and that publication is private-only unless VELOG_ALLOW_PUBLIC=1 is set. This adds valuable behavioral context beyond the annotations, which already signal destructive and non-idempotent behavior. It stops short of explaining side effects on the draft itself, but it is still informative.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two concise sentences, front-loaded with the core action and followed by a key limitation. Every sentence earns its place with no redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter publish action, the description covers the essential behavior and a major constraint. It could mention what happens to the draft after publishing or the return value, but given the tool's simplicity and existing annotations, the description is sufficiently complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes the id parameter and how to find it via velog_list_drafts. The tool description adds that no body needs to be passed, reinforcing that the only required input is the draft ID. This is a useful semantic addition beyond the schema's parameter description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific action: 'Publishes an existing temporary draft' with a distinct verb and resource. It also clarifies that the body uses saved content, which differentiates it from tools like velog_publish_post that would create a new post.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear context for when to use this tool: with an existing draft ID, and it notes the private-only default and the condition for public publishing. However, it does not explicitly name alternative tools or state when not to use it, such as when publishing a new post from scratch.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.