mcp-server-polarion
Related Servers
Alternatives to mcp-server-polarion
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Polarion ALM. Lets AI assistants read documents, work items, and traceability links — and create, update, and reorganize work items — directly from your Polarion instance.46112 PyPI15MIT
- AlicenseAqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables interaction with Siemens Polarion requirements management system through natural language. Supports authentication, project management, work item queries, document access, and requirements analysis.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM), including DOORS Next Generation, EWM, and ETM, for managing requirements, work items, tests, and project builds through natural language.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA CLI-first Polarion ALM client with MCP server support for AI assistants, enabling natural language interaction with Polarion projects, work items, tests, and plans.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceIntegrates with Siemens Polarion ALM to manage test cases, test runs, and results, with support for JUnit import and spreadsheet export.2MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to manage projects through OpenProject's API, providing complete project management capabilities including work packages, tasks, and team collaboration features.-
TDQS
Scored across 47 tools
Every tool targets a distinct resource and action; where domains overlap (work item vs document vs test record attachments), descriptions explicitly cross-reference their siblings. The read_/get_ split is clearly delineated, and enum/recipe helpers are unambiguously separate.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun snake_case pattern with clear singular/plural conventions (get single, list/update/create bulk). Prepositional verbs like move_work_item_to_document are used uniformly.
At 47 tools this is far above the well-scoped 3-15 range; even though the tools organize into per-resource families, the sheer number makes selection costly and could overwhelm agents.
Core lifecycle coverage for work items, documents, test runs/records, attachments, comments, and links is solid, with enum lookup and HTML/SQL recipe helpers that close write-path gaps. However, deletion is only available for links; attachments, comments, documents, and work items have no delete tool, which could create dead ends.