Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to MCP Notes

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that stores personal context as structured Markdown files with a knowledge graph, enabling AI agents to query identity, devices, servers, and projects on-demand.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to search, read, create, and maintain a local-first knowledge base using hybrid retrieval and Markdown note management through the Model Context Protocol.
      11 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An AI-optimized knowledge management system that provides semantic search, memory storage, and intelligent deduplication through the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
      113 npm
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables users to create timestamped atomic notes in Markdown, bidirectionally link and tag them into a searchable knowledge graph, and explore, synthesize, or discover relationships among ideas through Claude and other MCP-compatible clients. Notes are stored as human-readable files with an SQLite index that supports finding similar, central, and orphaned notes.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A personal knowledge management MCP server that enables capturing daily notes, meeting summaries, and ideas through Claude, with full-text search, git sync, and git activity tracking across projects.
      37 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.6/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have distinct purposes, such as create_directory for directory creation, read_note for reading single notes, and rollup for synthesizing daily notes. However, there is some overlap between read_note and read_multiple_notes, as the latter could be seen as a batch version of the former, potentially causing confusion in tool selection for agents.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    The naming conventions are mixed, with most tools using snake_case (e.g., create_directory, list_directory) and one using camelCase (evaluateInsight). This inconsistency reduces predictability, but the names are still generally readable and descriptive of their functions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 9 tools, the count is well-scoped for a notes management server. Each tool serves a clear purpose, such as file operations (create, read, write), directory management, searching, and synthesis, making the set comprehensive without being overwhelming.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD operations for notes and directories, including creation, reading, writing, listing, and searching. A minor gap exists in the lack of explicit update or delete tools for notes, though write_note can overwrite and tools like log might handle updates, which agents could work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues