stackchan-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to stackchan-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables Cursor and other MCP-compatible agents to control a Stack-chan robot companion, giving the AI vision, hearing, speech, movement, facial expressions, and environmental sensing.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables MCP clients to drive a Stack-chan desk robot over the network, exposing tools for photos, audio recording, speech, head movement, LED control, and touch events.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceConnects embodied devices (like StackChan, Raspberry Pi, ESP32) to AI via MCP protocol, enabling motion control with zero API cost, no PC required, and fully self-hosted.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables remote control of a StackChan robot via MQTT and MCP, allowing AI clients to switch its facial expressions and trigger camera photos for visual feedback.12MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server that enables controlling a StackChan robot via tools like speak, emote, and move head, with a relay service for ESP32 long polling.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI systems to control the Reachy Mini robot—speak, listen, see, and express emotions through physical movement. Compatible with Claude, GPT, Grok, and other MCP-compatible AIs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 14 tools
Most tools have no descriptions, making it impossible for an agent to distinguish between them. Tools like 'stackchan_listen', 'stackchan_say', 'stackchan_see', and 'stackchan_move' likely have distinct functions, but without descriptions they are ambiguous.
All tool names follow a consistent 'stackchan_' prefix followed by a clear noun or verb, such as 'stackchan_config_summary', 'stackchan_move', 'stackchan_say'. This pattern is predictable and easy to parse.
14 tools is reasonable for a robotics/personal assistant server covering configuration, movement, voice, and status. It is slightly above the ideal range (3-15) but still well-scoped.
Based on tool names, the server appears to cover core robot interactions (speech, movement, health, voice inbox). However, missing descriptions and evident gaps like 'stackchan_home' (unclear purpose) hinder full assessment. Coverage seems acceptable but not exhaustive.