Set the duration in milliseconds for every frame in a specified Aseprite file to create uniform animation timing.
Set the duration of all frames in milliseconds.
Args: filename: Name of the Aseprite file to modify duration_ms: Duration in milliseconds
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| filename | Yes | ||
| duration_ms | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
v0.1.0Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only states the action without disclosing side effects, permissions, or reversibility. For a mutation tool, this is insufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences plus argument bullets with no wasted words. Perfectly sized for the information conveyed.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple tool with two required parameters and no output schema. Could mention error conditions or that it modifies the file, but the core action is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Description adds meaning beyond the schema by specifying 'name of the Aseprite file' for filename and 'duration in milliseconds' for duration_ms, compensating for 0% schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it sets the duration for all frames in milliseconds, distinguishing it from the sibling tool 'set_frame_duration' which targets a specific frame.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'set_frame_duration'. Does not mention context or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.