micro-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to micro-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables local MCP clients to run Sailfish OS device, SDK, OBS, and Android/AppSupport development workflows via typed tools for SSH access, screenshots, touch injection, builds, logs, services, and repository checks.35BSD Zero Clause
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables developers to build, test, debug, and operate MCP servers from VS Code or CI, while also exposing trusted MCP capabilities to AI agents.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables managing local repositories, CLIs, MCP servers, and skills via MCP tools, with inventory tracking, guarded updates, and Docker-sandboxed trials.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables secure discovery and invocation of sandboxed filesystem, repository inspection, and utility tools through a unified MCP client with schema validation, timeouts, and execution traces.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables building and running MCP servers from a single executable, with shared daemons, concurrency controls, retries, caching, security, and OpenAPI integration.23 npmMIT
- AlicenseDqualityBmaintenanceEnables controlled local developer operations including file and process management, shell execution, SSH, WSL, Docker, Git, browser and desktop automation, media processing, and asynchronous jobs through MCP.146MIT
TDQS
Scored across 68 tools
Most tools are scoped to a distinct resource—domains, members, schedules, backups, retention, users—and the plural-list vs singular-action naming helps separate reads from mutations. A few generic status/logs/usage tools overlap in scope, but their descriptions clearly distinguish project status, account usage, platform status, and local runner logs.
All tools share the micro_ prefix and snake_case, and mutations mostly follow a consistent resource_action pattern such as domain_add, member_remove, and backup_restore. Minor deviations like bare-verb tools (doctor, remix, pull, rollback) and noun-only read tools keep it from being perfectly uniform.
68 tools is far beyond the well-scoped 3-15 range and is an extreme surface for a single MCP server, even for a broad platform. This will tax context windows and make tool discovery harder; several status, usage, and billing tools could likely be consolidated.
The surface covers most lifecycle operations across domains, members, invitations, schedules, backups, deployments, users, retention, and platform state, with create/read/update/delete coverage for major resources. Minor gaps remain—no file delete, no product delete/archive, no record create/update—so it is not a perfect 5.