A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceA production-ready Model Context Protocol suite over Streamable HTTP providing a sandboxed file server with tools, resources, prompts, and both manual and AI-driven clients.
MIT
clutter-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to clutter-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables learning and integration testing of the Model Context Protocol by evolving from a minimal server toward production-grade tools, resources, prompts, and agent interoperability.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceAn educational implementation of a Model Context Protocol server that demonstrates how to build a functional MCP server for integrating with various LLM clients like Claude Desktop.1164MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server providing tools for DB queries, API calls, file I/O, and text transformations, enabling AI agents like Claude to perform real-world actions.10MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables conversational LLMs to delegate complex research tasks to specialized AI agents powered by various OpenRouter models, coordinated by a Claude orchestrator.49 npm55MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceModel Context Protocol server that standardizes tool discovery, execution, and context management for AI applications.MIT
TDQS
A3.5/5.0
Scored across 19 tools
Disambiguation5/5
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose: building orgs, building zips, user info, project/run CRUD, document retrieval, polling, and querying. No two tools share overlapping functionality.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools follow verb_noun pattern (e.g., build_org, create_project, list_runs). The exception is clutter_whoami, which breaks the pattern by using a noun_verb style and including the service name.
Tool Count5/5
19 tools cover all necessary operations for the domain: org and run lifecycle, document management, project listing, user info, usage, and polling. The scope is well-balanced without being overwhelming.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers core CRUD for orgs, runs, documents, and projects. A minor gap is the lack of a get_project tool (only list_projects exists), but agents can work around it.
Maintenance
ActivityInactive
ResponsivenessNo issues