Skip to main content
Glama
mhopareprathmesh5-creator

expense-tracker-mcp

by mhopareprathmesh5-creator
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to expense-tracker-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • expense-tracker-mcp-server

      SAYOUNCDR
      F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracking personal expenses using FastMCP and SQLite, enabling adding, listing, updating, deleting expenses and summarizing by category via natural language tools.
      5
      1
      -

    • expense-tracker-mcp

      thearyangupta
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for managing personal expenses. Enables adding, listing, summarizing, editing, and deleting expenses, as well as adding credits, using PostgreSQL backend.
      -

    • expense-mcp

      justfsl50
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Personal expense tracker MCP server that enables tracking expenses, income, budgets, and savings goals through natural language.
      10
      1
      MIT

    • Expense Tracker MCP

      InfoSage05
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for tracking expenses with local SQLite storage. Provides tools to add, list, and summarize expenses by category.
      -

    • local-expense-tracker

      K37VIN
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A local MCP server for tracking personal expenses using SQLite, enabling users to add, list, and summarize expenses via natural language.
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.3/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool maps to a distinct action (auth check, category lookup, add, list, delete, summarize), and the list_expenses vs summarize distinction is explicitly drawn as rows versus totals. whoami is a bit of an outlier but clearly scoped to diagnosing visibility. Only minor overlap exists between listing and summarizing expense data.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear lower_snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_categories, add_expense, list_expenses, delete_expense). summarize and whoami break the noun-object pattern but are still readable and not confusingly styled. The pluralization of expenses is slightly inconsistent (list_expenses vs delete_expense) but harmless.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is a well-scoped size for an expense tracker: one diagnostic, one taxonomy lookup, and core expense operations. Each tool earns its place without redundancy or bloat. This is in the ideal 3–15 tool range.

    Completeness4/5

    The core lifecycle is covered: add, list, delete, summarize, plus category validation and auth scoping. The only notable gap is an update/edit operation, but users can delete and re-add an incorrect expense. Overall agents can accomplish expense tracking without dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources