get_products

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description bears full burden. It states it returns a catalog (read operation) but says nothing about auth, rate limits, pagination, or potential side effects. Adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, no fluff. Every word contributes meaning, and the purpose is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema or annotations, the description covers the core purpose and filters. However, it fails to mention the 'region' parameter, and provides no hints about return format or data size. Siblings are listed but not addressed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema has 100% descriptive coverage. Description adds value by grouping key filters (type, caffeine, dual-transporter) and reinforcing they are optional. However, it omits the 'region' parameter, which is in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns the product catalog and lists filtering criteria (type, caffeine, dual-transporter). It distinguishes from siblings: calculate_fueling_plan and get_nutrition_data are different functions. However, it does not explicitly contrast with them.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Mentions 'All filters are optional' which is a usage hint, but provides no guidance on when not to use this tool or alternatives. Lacks explicit context for when to choose this over siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.