get_scene_info

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden of disclosing side effects or behavioral traits. It only says 'Get' which implies read-only, but does not explicitly state that the operation is non-destructive, does not modify the scene, or has any telemetry side effects beyond the user_prompt parameter (which is not mentioned in the description).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that communicates the tool's purpose without unnecessary words or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimal and does not specify what 'detailed information' includes or what the return format is. Since there is no output schema, the description should ideally explain the nature of the returned data, but it does not. This is a significant gap for a getter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool description does not mention parameters, but the input schema provides a complete description for the single parameter 'user_prompt' (required for telemetry). Since schema coverage is 100%, the baseline of 3 applies, and the description adds no additional meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's function: 'Get detailed information about the current Blender scene.' This is a specific verb+resource (get + scene info) and distinguishes it from sibling tools that deal with textures, models, or other assets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any conditions, prerequisites, or situations where this tool is preferred over siblings. It simply states what it does.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.