smartsheet_get_workspace

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It discloses that the response includes all sheets and folders, which is useful, but it does not explicitly state read-only behavior, error handling, or any side effects. The verb 'Get' implies read-only, but it lacks thorough behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one concise sentence, immediately states the action and resource, and includes the key detail about sheets and folders. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is largely complete. It tells the user what they will get (workspace details including sheets and folders). The only minor gap is the lack of usage alternatives, but that is handled separately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers the parameter fully with a description ('The ID of the workspace to retrieve'). The description adds no additional semantic value beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets details of a specific workspace and explicitly includes all sheets and folders within it, distinguishing it from sibling tools like smartsheet_list_workspaces (which lists all) and smartsheet_get_sheet (which targets a sheet).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The usage is implied: you need a workspaceId to get details of a specific workspace, but there is no explicit guidance on when to use this versus listing workspaces or getting a sheet. It does not mention alternatives or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.