smartsheet_get_sheet_structure

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the burden of explaining behavior. It does disclose that only column structure is returned and that row data is absent, which clarifies the read-only scope. However, it does not describe the exact return format or any other behavioral details, leaving a moderate gap.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no redundant words. It efficiently conveys the essential scope and use case.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with one parameter and no output schema. The description clearly states the purpose and scope, and the sibling tools provide surrounding context. It could improve by briefly hinting at the response structure, but the current level is adequate for a lightweight metadata lookup.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides a complete description for the sole parameter sheetId ('The ID of the sheet'), so schema coverage is 100%. The tool description adds no additional meaning about this parameter. This aligns with the baseline of 3 when the schema carries the semantic weight.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose with a specific verb ('Get') and resource ('sheet'), and narrows the scope to 'column structure' while explicitly excluding 'row data'. This distinguishes it well from sibling tools like smartsheet_get_sheet, which presumably returns row content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'no row data' implicitly guides users away from using this tool when row-level data is needed, implying an alternative (e.g., smartsheet_get_sheet). The explicit use case 'useful for understanding sheet schema' provides context for when to invoke this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.