Skip to main content
Glama
Official STRING Database MCP Server

Official STRING Database MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to Official STRING Database MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for STRING-DB that enables querying protein-protein interaction networks, functional enrichment, and homology mappings.
      306 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for accessing the STRING protein interaction database. This server provides powerful tools for protein network analysis, functional enrichment, and comparative genomics through the STRING API.
      6
      4
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for interacting with the STRING database to analyze protein-protein interaction networks and functional enrichment. It enables users to map protein identifiers, retrieve interaction data, and generate biological network visualizations through natural language interfaces.
      11
      4
      BSD 3-Clause
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An MCP server that gives AI assistants access to biological and biomedical RDF databases via SPARQL at the RDF Portal, as well as selected REST APIs (NCBI E-utilities, UniProt, ChEMBL, PDB, Reactome, Rhea, MeSH, and more).
      2
      29
      21
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying gene annotations, full-text gene search, and species taxonomy via MyGene.info. Enables AI agents to access gene data through natural language questions.
      454 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 17 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, but several adjacent pairs (visual_network vs network_link, interactions_query_set vs all_interaction_partners, enrichment vs ppi_enrichment) share similar inputs and could be confused when the user's wording is vague. The descriptions clarify boundaries well enough to avoid major misselection.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All names use a consistent string_ snake_case prefix and are readable, but many are noun phrases (string_visual_network, string_enrichment) rather than following a uniform verb_noun pattern. The style is still predictable with only minor deviations.

    Tool Count4/5

    17 tools is slightly heavy but reasonable for STRING's broad functionality: identifier resolution, interactions, visualization, enrichment, homology, species lookup, export, and help. Each tool appears to cover a distinct capability rather than being redundant.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers STRING's main workflows, including species lookup, protein resolution, sequence search, interaction retrieval, network visualization/link/clustering, evidence lookup, functional annotation, functional and PPI enrichment, term lookup, file export, and help. No obvious domain gap is apparent, though some visualization and enrichment tools are closely related.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessLimited data