Read recent Laravel log lines

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds 'redacts', disclosing that sensitive information is removed, which is a key behavioral trait beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. It also explains it reads the newest log or a selected file, but could further detail redaction behavior or limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that conveys the core functionality without unnecessary words. It is front-loaded with the key action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 5 parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose and redaction but leaves gaps in parameter semantics and potential nuances (e.g., line limits, filtering via contains). It is minimally adequate but could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With only 40% schema coverage (descriptions for cwd and project), the description fails to add meaning for undocumented parameters like file, contains, and maxLines. It hints at a 'selected log file' but does not clarify parameter roles or usage beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool reads and redacts recent Laravel log lines, specifying both the action and the resource. It distinguishes from siblings like read_file or search_files by focusing on Laravel logs with redaction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While the description implies usage for reading Laravel logs with redaction, it does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives like read_file for non-log files or search_files for pattern matching. No when-not or alternative guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.