Skip to main content
Glama
mehrdad03

LocalDev MCP

by mehrdad03

Execute guarded multiline Laravel Tinker code

laravel_tinker_execute
Destructive

Run PHP code through Laravel Tinker with blocked file, network, and process access; database writes need explicit approval.

Instructions

Runs reviewed PHP code through Laravel Tinker using an ephemeral script outside the repository. Process, filesystem, network, raw-SQL, and secret access are blocked; database writes require explicit approval.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cwdNoOptional project-relative working directory. When omitted, the tool auto-detects the relevant app root.
codeYes
projectYesProject key from list_projects.
outputModeNosanitized
maxOutputCharsNo
timeoutSecondsNo
transactionModeNonone
allowDatabaseWriteNo
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds specific restrictions (process, filesystem, network, raw-SQL, secret access blocked) beyond annotations' destructiveHint, but doesn't detail return behavior or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences front-load purpose and restrictions; no filler text.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 8 parameters, no output schema, and complex restrictions, the description fails to explain parameter usage or expected outputs, leaving significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only 2 of 8 parameters have schema descriptions (25% coverage), and the tool description adds no parameter details; key fields like outputMode, transactionMode, allowDatabaseWrite are unexplained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it runs reviewed PHP code through Laravel Tinker with an ephemeral script, distinguishing it from other tools like run_command or run_artisan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Description lists blocked operations and approval requirement for database writes, implying safe use cases, but lacks explicit guidance on when to avoid or alternative tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mehrdad03/localdev-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server