update_tag
Update a tag's name and change its folder assignment using the tag ID.
Instructions
既存タグの名前・フォルダを更新する
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | 新しいタグ名 | |
| tag_id | Yes | 更新するタグID | |
| folder_id | No | 移動先フォルダID |
Update a tag's name and change its folder assignment using the tag ID.
既存タグの名前・フォルダを更新する
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | 新しいタグ名 | |
| tag_id | Yes | 更新するタグID | |
| folder_id | No | 移動先フォルダID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits like partial update behavior, permissions needed, or side effects. It only restates what the tool does.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the core action. However, it may be too brief to cover other aspects.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite low complexity, the absence of output schema description and behavioral context makes it incomplete for an agent to use reliably.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for each parameter, so the description adds minimal value. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it updates the name/folder of an existing tag, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like create_tag or list_tags.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidelines on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or exclusions provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mediiiiium/mcp-jp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server