ktalk_list_recordings

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It describes the listing operation and parameters but fails to mention if the operation is read-only, the absence of side effects, or any rate limits or access restrictions. The pagination mechanism is hinted but not explained.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with explanatory bullet points for each parameter. It is compact and front-loaded with the main purpose. Minor redundancy in the parameter list could be trimmed, but overall it is efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (not shown) and the tool's straightforward nature (listing with pagination), the description covers the core functionality. It explains all input parameters sufficiently. A brief note on output content would improve completeness but is not critical.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description compensates by explaining every parameter in detail, including formats (ISO 8601 for dates), default values, allowed sort orders, and the purpose of each parameter. This adds essential meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description starts with a clear verb and resource: 'List available KTalk conference recordings.' This directly states the tool's function and distinguishes it from siblings like ktalk_get_recording, which retrieves a single recording.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a list of parameters but gives no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as ktalk_get_recording. It implies usage for browsing without stating prerequisites or exclusion criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.