Delete Release

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true. The description adds 'permanently' and 'irreversible', reinforcing the destructive nature. It does not describe side effects beyond deletion or other behavioral traits. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences are well-structured: purpose first, then emphasis on permanence, then recommendation. The word 'irreversible' is slightly redundant with 'permanently', but overall concise and front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple destructive tool with no output schema, the description covers core behavior and suggests pre-checks. However, it lacks details on return value, error states, or permission requirements. Adequate but not thorough.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description only mentions 'Requires tag_name.' It does not explain the optional project_id parameter or provide any context about tag_name's format (e.g., pattern, max length). This adds minimal value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Delete'), the resource ('release record'), and the scope ('permanently', 'irreversible'). It specifies the key parameter (tag_name). Among siblings like create_release and update_release, it is unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description recommends pre-check tools (gitlab_get_release or gitlab_list_releases), implying the need to verify the release exists before deletion. It does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives, but the pre-check guidance is helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.